Dramatic image – but meaningless. It seems to imply that Obama’s proposed public health option would create a wait for care, or create bureacracy – neither of which is relevant to the health-care discussion. …So, could you please elaborate? Thanks for your frank, honest posts!
I love how you say that the image is meaningless. Why am I not surprised?
Do you understand what will happen if this country’s healthcare turns socialized? Are you paying attention to what is going on in places like Canada or the United Kingdom?
I think you are pretty capable of clicking on Michelle Malkin’s link and joining in on the discussion over there vs. trying to insult me.
Not surprised at my reply? Why do you say that? It’s a conversation.
Yes I’m completely aware of other countries’ experiences, and it will not be socialized *in the same way* as Canada & the UK, just as the US republic is not democratic *in the same way* as France or Germany.
No insult intended – Comments are available here, so I expressed myself here where you posted the image.
You still have failed to elaborate a purpose to the image, btw. ;-)
I don’t need to elaborate on anything if I don’t feel like it. It’s my blog. I can do whatever I’d like to with it. You don’t like it… get your own blog. At this point in time your comments are meaningless to me. So buzz off.
Thanks, Angela. I have my own blog; five, in fact and 2 on sexual health. You can do whatever you want with your blog, including insulting readers like me, but if you’re hoping to win friends or influence people on sexual health care you’re lost. Take care, really.
Insulting readers like you that insult me? That’s rich. So in other words, you can insult me but I’m not supposed to stand up for myself? I haven’t lost anybody.. I’ve been online since 1997 since long before peeps such as yourself even thought about blogging. Peace Out!
I’m disappointed that out of all the posts on this blog you chose to respond to one that was written up last June. For the record, it’s not the only one that doesn’t pertain to “sexual” health. Go Figure!?
Dramatic image – but meaningless. It seems to imply that Obama’s proposed public health option would create a wait for care, or create bureacracy – neither of which is relevant to the health-care discussion. …So, could you please elaborate? Thanks for your frank, honest posts!
I love how you say that the image is meaningless. Why am I not surprised?
Do you understand what will happen if this country’s healthcare turns socialized? Are you paying attention to what is going on in places like Canada or the United Kingdom?
I think you are pretty capable of clicking on Michelle Malkin’s link and joining in on the discussion over there vs. trying to insult me.
Not surprised at my reply? Why do you say that? It’s a conversation.
Yes I’m completely aware of other countries’ experiences, and it will not be socialized *in the same way* as Canada & the UK, just as the US republic is not democratic *in the same way* as France or Germany.
No insult intended – Comments are available here, so I expressed myself here where you posted the image.
You still have failed to elaborate a purpose to the image, btw. ;-)
I don’t need to elaborate on anything if I don’t feel like it. It’s my blog. I can do whatever I’d like to with it. You don’t like it… get your own blog. At this point in time your comments are meaningless to me. So buzz off.
Thanks, Angela. I have my own blog; five, in fact and 2 on sexual health. You can do whatever you want with your blog, including insulting readers like me, but if you’re hoping to win friends or influence people on sexual health care you’re lost. Take care, really.
Insulting readers like you that insult me? That’s rich. So in other words, you can insult me but I’m not supposed to stand up for myself? I haven’t lost anybody.. I’ve been online since 1997 since long before peeps such as yourself even thought about blogging. Peace Out!
[...] Obamacare: What number will you be? [...]
I’m disappointed that you posted this…what does this have to do with sexual health?
I’m disappointed that out of all the posts on this blog you chose to respond to one that was written up last June. For the record, it’s not the only one that doesn’t pertain to “sexual” health. Go Figure!?