Were you trying to contact Oprah Winfrey?
Posted on Thursday, September 18th, 2008 at 8:00 AMI got this note in my e-mail inbox:
I used to tivo all your shows, just to be sure I won’t miss any, since I use to admire you.All has changed since I found out how unfair your are about Sara Palin, and how you really are trying to use your power to force people to feel and vote the way you want it. So long, no more of you in my book of life
Here are my thoughts on the issue:
I believe you wrote to me because you thought that you would actually reach Oprah Winfrey. It’s probably because a lot of people wrote to Oprah hoping that she would do a show on herpes.
In fact, you probably saw all those letters to Oprah posted on my Herpes Awareness page. Is that right? Well, you won’t reach Oprah Winfrey from that page.
Just thought you should know.
As for Oprah not having Sarah Palin on her show, I too think that is unfair.
She had Barack Obama on her show when he was promoting his book. She’s trying to make it seem as if nobody is coming on her show while they are running for President of the United States. As if she didn’t know he would be gunning for the White House.
I don’t agree with her at all. I think she should have Sarah Palin on her show and I don’t blame you for boycotting her as a result.
Miss Winfrey: Not in the interests of disease, although H.I.V has been addressed in some of my research, I would not ever embarass nor create a conflict for your production. Last week I did see the KTVU-TV truck as you had been intentioned to contact me through your helps services. It was not spoken that the cameras were of your intention. In Sacramento there are camera trucks around several times a year, and around the Capitol several times a week, so you never know what it is about, although they do know me. My opening introduction involves my listing in Library of Congress as telecommunication and Library of Congress as Digital Sound and Digital Video; then we talk bout my design and troubleshoot of design of the multi-valve feature in the internal combustion engine and then we talk about medical discoveries. In your audience, no one would believe the report. I have been a very busy man.
I was not sure it was you at the convention center either; however, the situation here might have not been very good in regard to avoiding government intervention. The Oprah Winfrey Show has no oath of office from satte personnel, with exception of tax dollars in state of California government,and that is why I am here in my interests. The southern California area has some interests which require government attention. I do appreciate your magazine and your television show; however, the United States has spoken in regard to Television or telecommunication or public publish ivolving implementation of office or the law (United States Supreme Court, October, 1993).
I am trying to be as sensitive as possible where this government is concerned, so I trust these things can be held in candor. There are two lands owned by me in California involved in occupation by some government personnel, there are drug suppiers in threat against the state of California and there are businesses in California I have not been allowed because of some in those personnel involving non-governemnt personnel to require policy of my businesses against my ocupation without burden of proof of my ownership of those businesses. And we know that all money, in U.S.S.C, Oct., 1992, comes through business. That citation begins with “All business, including the courts”, being required to perform in a raasonable manner. Whenever business and government are involved together in civil rights violation, it almost always comes out this way, too. However, such proof of ownership is located in the office of a U.S. late Senator. It is that list which has been seen to in that office. There is also a business I own in southern California; even a court of law the was unable to address because they require some “work in government there”. So, they sent the concern to one of the groups who have occupied my land there. I didn’t think your office would want to be involved in a shame of government and the state of California certainly does not require my announcements to the effect on the air here in Sacramento. There is enough concern here about furloughs and layoffs as well as the number of interests in my behalf in governemnt here. You can almost cut that with a knife, to hear of it, sometimes. I am still available for comment; however, I would need to speak around what I am trying to do to accommodate these people here. They have determined I am a sensitive issue and I see the point, although it sometimes seems when you are sensitive to a governement, you are trying to avoid the topic of “the hippopotamus in the room” that no one wants to talk about. The longer you wait for the solution, the more attention it requires. The subject there is denial. And, I am not much for public revelation of such matters of government, and I do not get into “Protest, protest, protest.” You might ask the state if a plackard is required, though. It just is’t my job, and I am trying to get on with the state of California as well as I am afforded to do so. Without government we have anarchy. So, we elect people to office and they make appointments we trust will serve the self same We the people of the United States, no matter what state. Sometimes they get together in a common cause because they do not know someone. The comment “I never thought it would be me” can be heard in all quarters of the matter when it is dealt with.
So I hope you understand. It was never my intent to avoid your broadcast. It doesn’t seem to be a very good subject for the time.
California is a fine government of the United States and I have no interests in delineating from them any of the respect they are to be afforded, though it does require some changes in offices. Niether do I require a standing down for that stance nor for any other. I am one of the largest employers in the state and therefore one of the largest taxpayers. And I wish to be in a favored position to do business here. I need to be in posession of my faculties, not relieved of them to make me less effective as an owner, nor as an individual for my own interests, including marriage and family when possible.
When the law is passed it is set in the law; no other matter of the law is required short of enforcement and can be found cited. The U.S. says it can be found any year.
God Bless your heart for your interests and the work you do. There are some people here who are attempting to get me in as well and I am still trying to work with them. They are private personnel and wish to remain that way.
In departemnt of Justice,
Sent One
of The Kingdom of God
You do realize this is not Oprah Winfrey’s blog, right? :]